This entry is part 6 of 9 in the series Religion of the Month Club

We met at Joe and David’s farm for a Potluck dinner on Saturday May 22 at 3pm.

~Update: We had a big crowd for Loring’s talk about christianity. He talked about his story, the history of christianity, and answered a bunch of questions. It was great! The food was also awesome, and of course the socializing was wonderful too.

Here are my notes that I took from Loring’s talk:

  • The view of fundamentalism is “verbal plenary inerrancy”
  • fundamentalists are separatists, they can’t associate with people who don’t think like they do. Evangelicals are theologically the same and often share a lot in common, but they are willing to deal with the wider church, to work with people who might think differently (if I recall, in hopes of converting them at some point)
  • Why should atheists know the bible? Because if we are going to argue with christians, we can’t afford to make a mistake about christianity.
  • The old testament was written by around 160-150 BCE. It started to come into shape in the first century CE.
  • A great author is Bart Ehrman
  • Crucifixion was a penalty reserved for people undermining the Roman state. It was a political statement: do not oppose the Roman empire. It wasn’t for thieves like Barabbas. (To note an error in the Gospels)
  • Christians modified the order of the old testament. The Jews have it in a different order.
  • The Apocrypha: predates christianity. The Palestinians said it wasn’t scripture. The Egyptians said it was. Protestants reject it, Catholics accept it.
  • The new testament took shape around the 300′s CE. Constantine had his conversion in 312.
  • The Council of Nicaea was 325 CE. It asked the question, who was Jesus?
  • Orthodoxy: a description of who won politically to decide what is orthodoxy and what is the “truth” and who ended up being heretics.
  • Think of fundamentalism as a cone, with Jesus and his disciples at the point at the bottom. Over time things change and it gets farther from Jesus, things change. Fundamentalists are trying to get back to the base where it was pure, how it was with Jesus.
  • Whereas regular christianity is more like an hourglass. At the base it starts with Jesus and grows. Then in the 300′s CE, there is a narrowing of doctrine and the orthodoxy is set. Then it branches back out again like the top of the hourglass. Now we have all kinds of christianity.
  • Anabaptists are sects that baptize adults instead of babies. They baptize believers.
  • Victor Stenger is another great author to consider
  • Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity by John Loftus is another great book, according to Loring. It has great documentation and is rational, theological and philosophical.
  • Loring talked about the different versions of the bible. He uses the New American Standard Bible.
  • Epistemology: how you know what you know
  • The gospels: A book called Synopsis of the Four Gospels compares the gospels in chart form with original text as well.
    • Mark is the oldest – about 70 CE
    • Matthew appears to be from Mark, Q and M and was written in the 80′s CE
    • Luke was also written in the 80′s CE and appears to be written from Mark, Q and L
    • John is the newest, from about 95 CE and is very different than the other three.
  • Paul Kurtz is another great author. He wrote, among many other books, Science and Ethics: Can Science Help Us Make Wise Moral Judgments?.

~ Read the rest of this entry »

The following is a question asked of Daniel Dennett, and his answer which was in the Washington Post the other day. My comments are below *.

Q: Is there widespread media bias against Christianity? Against evangelicals such as Brit Hume and Sarah Palin? Against public figures who speak openly and directly about their faith? Against people who believe as you do?

There is no media bias against Christianity. If it appears to some people that there is, it is probably because after decades of hyper-diplomacy and a generally accepted mutual understanding that religion was not to be criticized, we have finally begun breaking through that taboo and are beginning to see candid discussions of the varieties of religious folly in American life. Activities that would be condemned by all if they were not cloaked in the protective mantle of religion are beginning to be subjected to proper scrutiny.

There is still a lot to accomplish however. We need to change the prevailing assumptions in the same way that public opinion has been reversed on drunk driving. When I was young, drunk drivers tended to be excused because, after all, they were drunk! Today, happily, we hold them doubly culpable for any misdeeds they commit while under the influence. Read the rest of this entry »

This entry is part 7 of 17 in the series Monthly Meetings

128743435787528693We are meeting December 6 at 5 pm for our regular monthly get together.

~

Dec 7th Update:

Yesterday’s meeting was amazingly successful! Thanks to the 22 people who showed up to make it interesting, lively and fun.

We ran the gamut from christian apologist to deists to a bunch of godless athesists. Rachel brought tracts to hand out as well as great arguments for why we should believe in god. Her arguments were classic but I think we held our own and had fun refuting her reasoning.

Godless Heathens Converted: 0 (although Joe raised his hand when she asked if anyone accepted her arguments and wanted to convert, but I think he was just being supportive since he was pretending to be on her side and help her out. Joe you can clarify if you were really converted!)

At any rate, it was fun. Afterwards, we hung out and talked about anything and everything (which atheists can do. We don’t always talk about religion!) It was hard to leave because it was such a fun night.

Thank you so much for opening your home to us, Tim. That made the night so much more successful and comfortable. :D

~

The theme of this meeting is The Great Conversion!

Rachel (the president of the Brights) is going to use her guile, wit and best emotional appeals to try to convert us to christianity! (She’s a nonbeliever. This is all done in jest, but also to help us practice our logical discussion skills)

With our best atheist and skeptical logic we will defend our lack of belief and counter her arguments.

Bring along any logical fallacy books you might have, in case you want to reference them.

Rachel does not have to follow any rules. She is allowed to use any method (besides physical torture) to try to convert us.

We, on the other hand, will be polite and friendly, and use our best logic, reason and scientific research to defeat her conversion attempts.

This should be great fun for everyone!

After the event, I’ll report back here with how things went and how many atheists were re-converted. Let’s make a strong, positive showing, fellow heathens! :D

Oh, if you are on the fence, either as an agnostic or in some other manner, feel free to come along and support Rachel with your arguments. All are welcome, even if you just want to watch us discuss faith vs reason. :D

We met at Tim’s House (thanks Tim!)

This entry is part 5 of 12 in the series Other Events

Announcing the 2010 Mythicist Prize

The Mythicists’ Forum, a consortium of New Testament scholars, together with American Atheists, Inc., have the pleasure to announce the 2010 Mythicist Prize.

THE PRIZE

The sum of $1,000 (U.S.) will be awarded to the author of a submitted essay which, in the opinion of the judges, sheds light on the origins of Christianity and, at the same time, supports the proposition that Jesus of Nazareth did not exist.

ELIGIBILITY

Anyone is eligible to submit an essay.  The prizewinning contribution will be published in 2010, along with submissions of distinction which merit an Honorable Mention. The publisher will be announced at the time of the award. Read the rest of this entry »

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline