Something that I have always found frustrating is how religious people (and people who are really into politics) are so dogmatic about their beliefs. As a skeptical atheist, I have come to realize that challenging peoples’ beliefs is usually frustrating, maddening, and completely fruitless. Well, Doctor Professor Luke Galen gave a talk recently called Terror Management: How Our Worldviews Help Us Deny Death. You can listen to the lecture through the Reasonable Doubts podcast (of which he’s a part): RD Extra: Denying Death, and you can see Dr. Galen’s slides here (pdf)

I know not all of you like to listen to podcasts. So I went through it and transcribed a good chunk of what Luke said in his lecture, the parts that I thought were most important. I have a few thoughts afterward. By the way, I missed the beginning for reasons I can’t remember (this took me a couple of days to make it all make sense) but this is a lecture about Dr. Ernest Becker and Terror Management Theory.

Partial transcript:

…This is where we get neurotic about death. It’s the ultimate inferiority complex. Our lifespan is limited. We realize we must die but in striving to overcome that, it creates more problems. We put a lot of energy into denying death.

One way to summarize Becker’s theory: It’s good to have a brain that can plan for the future and be self-aware, but the problem is that when we become scared of our own mortality it sets up a defense against that. Part of the defense involves symbols. We think symbolically and so our symbols set up a barrier. These symbols can be religious, political, symbols of our mastery over the world, symbols of making money, etc.

What Becker thought was that culture itself is a buffer against these threats to our self esteem. We set up our belief in culture and human culture really is an attempt to deal with threats to our own mortality and our self esteem. So first, what is self esteem?

Self esteem is not just a product of you, individually. What Becker thought was that self esteem was something you get a sense of only through other people. So you think of yourself as a valued person who has powers, who can act upon the world, but that is socially validated by parents, siblings, peers, a gradually expanding group of people. This gets more abstract and symbolic as the child grows up. So as a young adult you might latch onto ideologies. For many people this is religion. You join a church and get a sense of what you need to do to be good or bad from those groups too. The good thing is that these groups give you clear guidelines to derive your self esteem.

This can be positive or negative. So if you don’t get positive reinforcement, you’ll look for self esteem and validation in other ways. So this is why people join cults and gangs, etc. Read the rest of this entry »

This entry is part 11 of 12 in the series Logic and Critical Thinking

I know it’s Spring and no one wants to be thinking of christmas this time of year, but Joe sent me a paper called Ho, Ho, Hoax: The Case against Santa Claus by Ernâni Magalhães, Visiting Assistant Professor at WVU. It makes some excellent points which really got me thinking.

Before I read this paper, I thought Dale McGowan‘s take on Santa to be the best way to handle it. In a nutshell, he says Santa is a dry run for letting kids reason their way through the fact that Santa is a myth, to then figuring out that religion is mythical, as he puts it, Santa is “the ultimate dry run for a developing inquiring mind”. It makes sense in a way. But then Joe told me about his experience as a kid.

Joe really believed in Santa, the Easter Bunny, etc. Then one day a kid in the playground told him it was all a pack of lies. Joe believed him and went home crying. He was devastated. When Joe and I talked about the McGowan philosophy of Santa, I figured out that in theory it seems like a great idea, but maybe in practice it could backfire and cause a lot of unhappiness and pain for kids who don’t get to reason it out for themselves but are told by other children.

And is it necessary to lie to children about a mythical jolly old fat man? Does it increase their happiness, improve their moral fiber? Does it make them better little people, or better adults down the line? And is there an alternative to lying about Santa?

First, there are 3 alternatives, according to Ernâni:

  • Disbelief: The parent tells the child Santa Claus is not real
  • Neutrality: The parent does not inform the child one way or the other
  • Pretense: The parent invites the child to pretend there is a Santa Claus.(page 13)

…inviting to pretend there is a Santa Claus is morally superior to encouraging to believe. (14)

I never thought of this as an option, but it makes sense. You get all the good fun of Santa but you don’t get the lies and beliefs in those lies.

What about short term pleasure and pain? Here is what Ernâni has to say:

The extent to which the pleasure of children and adults justifies the Santa Claus lie depends on the amount of pleasure available from non-deceitful alternatives. The alternative that most closely replicates telling children there is a Santa Claus involves inviting children to pretend there is one. Although pretending something is real is fundamentally different from believing it is, as I have argued, many of the emotions evoked by an object believed to be real are also evoked by objects supposed to be fictional. Children and adults derive great pleasure from creatures of their imaginations, as witnessed by the large crowds at movie theaters. Children who are old enough to know she is fictional still derive great enjoyment from the pretense that Cinderella is a real person with real hopes. And, it is easy to replicate the gift-giving aspect of the Santa experience, which is surely a significant factor in the child’s enjoyment. (15-16)

Interesting and thought-provoking, don’t you think? This is even more important: Read the rest of this entry »

This entry is part 6 of 9 in the series Religion of the Month Club

We met at Joe and David’s farm for a Potluck dinner on Saturday May 22 at 3pm.

~Update: We had a big crowd for Loring’s talk about christianity. He talked about his story, the history of christianity, and answered a bunch of questions. It was great! The food was also awesome, and of course the socializing was wonderful too.

Here are my notes that I took from Loring’s talk:

  • The view of fundamentalism is “verbal plenary inerrancy”
  • fundamentalists are separatists, they can’t associate with people who don’t think like they do. Evangelicals are theologically the same and often share a lot in common, but they are willing to deal with the wider church, to work with people who might think differently (if I recall, in hopes of converting them at some point)
  • Why should atheists know the bible? Because if we are going to argue with christians, we can’t afford to make a mistake about christianity.
  • The old testament was written by around 160-150 BCE. It started to come into shape in the first century CE.
  • A great author is Bart Ehrman
  • Crucifixion was a penalty reserved for people undermining the Roman state. It was a political statement: do not oppose the Roman empire. It wasn’t for thieves like Barabbas. (To note an error in the Gospels)
  • Christians modified the order of the old testament. The Jews have it in a different order.
  • The Apocrypha: predates christianity. The Palestinians said it wasn’t scripture. The Egyptians said it was. Protestants reject it, Catholics accept it.
  • The new testament took shape around the 300′s CE. Constantine had his conversion in 312.
  • The Council of Nicaea was 325 CE. It asked the question, who was Jesus?
  • Orthodoxy: a description of who won politically to decide what is orthodoxy and what is the “truth” and who ended up being heretics.
  • Think of fundamentalism as a cone, with Jesus and his disciples at the point at the bottom. Over time things change and it gets farther from Jesus, things change. Fundamentalists are trying to get back to the base where it was pure, how it was with Jesus.
  • Whereas regular christianity is more like an hourglass. At the base it starts with Jesus and grows. Then in the 300′s CE, there is a narrowing of doctrine and the orthodoxy is set. Then it branches back out again like the top of the hourglass. Now we have all kinds of christianity.
  • Anabaptists are sects that baptize adults instead of babies. They baptize believers.
  • Victor Stenger is another great author to consider
  • Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity by John Loftus is another great book, according to Loring. It has great documentation and is rational, theological and philosophical.
  • Loring talked about the different versions of the bible. He uses the New American Standard Bible.
  • Epistemology: how you know what you know
  • The gospels: A book called Synopsis of the Four Gospels compares the gospels in chart form with original text as well.
    • Mark is the oldest – about 70 CE
    • Matthew appears to be from Mark, Q and M and was written in the 80′s CE
    • Luke was also written in the 80′s CE and appears to be written from Mark, Q and L
    • John is the newest, from about 95 CE and is very different than the other three.
  • Paul Kurtz is another great author. He wrote, among many other books, Science and Ethics: Can Science Help Us Make Wise Moral Judgments?.

~ Read the rest of this entry »

This entry is part 4 of 4 in the series News

Dan Barker from the Freedom From Religion Foundation explains the unconstitutionality of the National Day of Prayer and how we are not a christian nation. And for once, Faux News has an intelligent conversation instead of trying to have a pissing match. (~ 5 minutes)

Obama still proclaimed the National Day of Prayer this year, even though the ruling said it was unconstitutional. The government is wasting good tax dollars appealing. Of course.

I guess we’ll still keep holding the National Day of Reason until reason and the constitution prevail.

This entry is part 15 of 18 in the series Book Club Meetings

We met at 5pm at the Blue Moose on Sunday, May 16 for the Freethinkers Morgantown Book Club.

~We had a great meeting where we got through the rest of the old testament. Swami, a Freethinker from Orlando,  came up when we were almost done and we enjoyed talking to him. He came to dinner with us as well. A lot of interesting discussion took place over dinner. I think we solved all of America’s problems, and probably most of the world’s as well. :P

~

We are reading God Hates You, Hate Him Back: Making Sense of The Bible by CJ Werleman.

~EDIT: Since we’re not getting anyone to volunteer for chapters, let’s do it a different way. We are covering Chapters 18-39 (pages 133-181).

Bring in whatever notes you feel you’d like to share and we’ll just go through the chapters and talk about whatever we find interesting.

~

This is an irreverant review of the bible. Since christianity is the religion we deal with the most as atheists, we will spend some time using this book as a reference. Bring your bible as well, if you want, for more detailed discussions.

This entry is part 13 of 18 in the series Book Club Meetings

We met at 5pm on Sunday, April 18 at the Blue Moose for the Freethinkers Morgantown Book Club.

Update: We met for a lively and interesting discussion about the first 17 books of the bible. We also talked about some of the exciting things we have coming up in the next few months. Then we went to dinner for more casual conversation.

~

The book we’ll be talking about is God Hates You, Hate Him Back: Making Sense of The Bible by CJ Werleman.

This is an irreverant review of the bible. Since christianity is the religion we deal with the most as atheists, we will spend some time using this book as a reference. Bring your bible as well, if you want, for more detailed discussions.

For our first meeting, let’s focus on The Books of the Pentateuch (1-5) and the History Books (6-17). Pick your chapters that you’ll cover. I’d say pick 2 or 3 chapters if you like, especially if some are short.

The Books of the Pentateuch:
1. Genesis: Gerald
2. Exodus: Gerald
3. Leviticus:   Neece
4. Numbers: Daniel
5. Deuteronomy: Daniel
The History Books:
6. Joshua: Brent
7. Judges: Brent
8. Ruth:   Neece
9. Samuel 1: Gerald but if anyone wants this just leave a comment.
10. Samuel 2: Gerald but if anyone wants this just leave a comment.
11. Kings 1: Gerald but if anyone wants this just leave a comment.
12. Kings 2: Gerald but if anyone wants this just leave a comment.
13 and 14. Chronicles 1 and 2:
15 and 16. Ezra and Nehemiah:
17. Esther:   Neece

From Amazon: Read the rest of this entry »

I have four videos to share with you, and they all have to do with Sam Harris, one of the Four Horsemen (Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett are the other three). Remember the other day I posted the actual TED talk Sam did about science and morality.

The first video is on CNN Opinion and therefore it’s just a link to its page. Sam talks to CNN (at the TED conference) about how religion discussions distract us from truly important issues. It’s almost 4 minutes long. If you go there to the page, it has a lot of what he said under the video.

Project Reason, which Sam Harris helped start, had a video contest recently. So here are the winners.

Winning Video: The Values We All Stand For

Read the rest of this entry »

This entry is part 4 of 9 in the series Religion of the Month Club

We met at the Blue Moose at 5 pm on Sunday, March 28.

~

Update: We had a very interesting meeting, talking mainly about the Cao Dai. What an interesting religion in Vietnam. Thanks to Jim for sharing that with us. Dinner afterwards was full of lively conversation.

We also brainstormed on our T-shirt for Morgantown CoR and came up with something we all seemed happy with. I finished the design and ordered the shirts. See here for the final design.

~

We are spending the first 15 minutes or so on a Vietnamese religion called the Cao Dai. Jim will be sharing that with us as he spent a bit of time there recently.

After that, we’ll talk about Irish Folklore. So bring along some information on that.

Make sure you got your quotes in. If you have any last minute ones for our Morgantown CoR t-shirt design, bring them in so we can vote tonight! Also let us know if you want a shirt. See the details of the Quote Contest here.

If anyone wants to let us know what Irish Folklore you will talk about I’ll post it here:

  • Neece: Four leaf clovers
This entry is part 12 of 18 in the series Book Club Meetings

EDIT! :D We met March 20 at 2pm at Joe and David’s Farm to celebrate the Spring Equinox with a Potluck dinner. We also finished up The God Virus.

Update: We had a fantastic time! We socialized, celebrated, decided, talked, shared, ate, drank, ate more, and talked some more. Thanks so much to Joe and David for being such gracious hosts to their beautiful home and farm! Want to see some pictures I took of our Nature Walk?

NOTE: This is INSTEAD OF meeting March 21. We are now meeting the day before. Any questions, email Neece.

I forgot to bring up the subject of our Secular Service in our regular meeting! So we’ll spend a few minutes when we get together for this meeting, gathering ideas and then getting a tally on which service we’re all most interested in. So bring your ideas or comment here with suggestions if you can’t make the meeting.

~

We had so much discussion for The God Virus that we only go through chapter 5. So we’re going to finish the book next month, chapter 6 to the end.

The book we are reading  is The God Virus: How religion infects our lives and culture by Darrel W. Ray

We still need someone to take chapter 11, and chapter 10 is also available, if someone wants it.

  • 6. The Myth of Unchanging Morality: Daniel
  • 7. Jesus My Personal Savior: The Roots of American Evangelism: Gerald
  • 8. Intelligence, Personality and the God Virus: Neece
  • 9. Understanding and Living With The God Virus: Neece
  • 10. The Journey: Living a Virus-Free Life: Brent
  • 11. The God Virus and Science:  Gerald
  • 12. The Future of an Illusion: Daniel Read the rest of this entry »

Last night Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) filed a D.C. voucher amendment to the second jobs bill under consideration by the Senate.  The D.C. voucher program uses taxpayer funds to pay for parents to send their children to private religious schools. The program is called the “D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program,” but a 2007 government report found that these vouchers do not give D.C. students seeking a private school education sufficient secular choices, forcing them to attend religious schools or remain in the failing public school system.

By design, voucher programs aid struggling Christian schools. A July 2009 report by Rutgers University on the D.C. voucher program concluded that the way the voucher program is structured “essentially push[es] students into Christian Association and Catholic schools, pricing out independent (non-religious) schools and Hebrew schools.”

By continuing this program, those of us who do not wish to subsidize someone else’s church will continue to be forced to do so through our federal tax dollars.

The vote will occur sometime today. Please take five minutes and email your Senators below and tell them to vote against this amendment that would re-authorize this program.

The Secular Coalition for America opposes the use of government funds for religious purposes, including vouchers for religious schools. We agree with the founders of the United States that no individual taxpayer should be required to pay for someone else’s religion. We agree with James Madison. Senator Lieberman wants us to go in a different direction.

The D.C. Opportunity Scholarship, with your tax money, funds and enables proselytizing and religious discrimination. Recipients of the vouchers who attend religious schools are not even allowed to opt out of religious activities at their school—a direct affront to religious freedom.

It is critical that you write your Senators today and ask them to oppose Sen. Lieberman’s amendment that would re-authorize this program and spend your taxes to fund the religious education of children in D.C.

Go to Secular Coalition for America to send a letter today.

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline